In this weeks assignment we were given the following scenario:
A training manager has been frustrated with the quality of communication among trainees in his face-to-face training sessions and wants to try something new. With his supervisor’s permission, the trainer plans to convert all current training modules to a blended learning format, which would provide trainees and trainers the opportunity to interact with each other and learn the material in both a face-to-face and online environment. In addition, he is considering putting all of his training materials on a server so that the trainees have access to resources and assignments at all times.
The four questions that we were asked to consider when creating a best practices guide for the trainer are:
- What are some of the pre-planning strategies the trainer needs to consider before converting his program?
- What aspects of his original training program could be enhanced in the distance learning format?
- How will his role, as trainer, change in a distance learning environment?
- What steps should the trainer take to encourage the trainees to communicate online?
While I did create a guide for Best practices for converting from traditional to online learning I am not advocating the teaching of communications skills online. In my course of studies and experiences, I have found that there are certain skills that are better taught face to face and in groups and communications is one of them. We have raised a generation of children who do not know how to effectively communicate because most of their interactions happen via texting, chat rooms, and other external communication methods. Communication skills are best acquired in my opinion through face to face contact. That said my guide follows.
Best Practices Guide:
Blended Learning Environments
In order to convert a traditional face-to-face program to a blended learning class, an instructional designer must first consider what differentiates online learning from face-to-face learning. An important point to consider is that one cannot directly convert traditional training to online training simply by dumping information from face to face training into a web format. Rather, the Equivalency Theory states that the online learning environment needs to be equivalent in achieving the same learning outcomes as traditional learning. A variety of equivalent instructional approaches should be provided for students.
Berge, Muilenburg and Van Haneghan (2002) identified the top ten potential barriers to the
Implementation of distance education in a business or corporate environment they are:
· Organizational Resistance to change
· Lack of technical support
· Evaluation and Effectiveness
· Social Interaction
· Access to Technology
· Legal Issues
· Feeling threatened by technology
· Administrative Structure
Berge (2007) went on to identify the tools necessary to overcome these barriers:
· Budget
· Infrastructure
· Communication
· Work Force Development
· Organizational Policy
The best practice for implementing a blended education class requires a corporation to dedicate significant time, ample funding, clear strategic planning, dedicated technology and support. It requires organizational change to overcome general resistance to change, and resistance to technology and the implementation of a new training structure. The workload and time management of the training managers, trainers, and trainee are very critical to ensuring this form of teaching integrates well with existing practices.
According to Piskurich there are four key differences between traditional and online facilitation they are:
1. Connecting with the students is very important. With online learning it is more difficult to know what your learners are doing and how they are doing it.
2. Activities and applications are the heart of an online course.
3. Content is critical, but in the end it’s the activities that will help students learn the content.
4. You must build time into the implementation phase to think about and practice the role of facilitating the online portions of your class.
The instructional designer structures the online learning, usually with the aid of a course management system (CMS). A CMS will provide the online tools needed to facilitate student activities and online discussions. There are many free CMS choices available such as Ectolearn (www.ectolearning.com ), Moodle (www.moodle.org) and Lecture Share (www.lectureshare.com ). Once a CMS has been selected, it is time to decide what activities, assignments and other parts of the coursework should be face-to-face and what should be online.
Like in all instructional design processes, some essential pre-planning strategies need to be adopted when retooling a face- to-face course for online delivery. Firstly, the trainer/instructor must be conscious of the transformation they will undergo from their role as a primary source of information and knowledge to that of a facilitator of learning.
When converting a face-to-face course into an online course, some key questions and issues should be considered when planning. These include knowing the learners, their technological capabilities, learning styles and the appropriate technology to use. There may also be the need for an online orientation for the learners. Other things to be considered include:
· Determine ways to revise traditional classroom materials for an online format.
· Plan activities that encourage interactivity at all the sites.
· Create activities that foster group work among students.
· Prepare for a backup plan in case of technical difficulties with your online
delivery system
When teaching in a Synchronous environment, many traditional classroom instructional approaches can be incorporated. Short lectures help facilitate instruction, Discussions and activities can fit into audio and video components of the a live situations. Selecting methods of teaching that provides the learner with enough interaction to keep them on task and encourages them to be more student-centered. Strategies such as problem based learning, collaboration, and student led discussions work well in asynchronous settings (Simonson, Smaldinom Albright & Zvacek)
The instructor of the online course role is more facilitator than trainer. The role as a facilitator is to monitor students’ online activity, make sure they are engaged, and keep them on task with the discussions and assignments. Additionally the facilitator should thoroughly review the lesson plan and know how the material will be taught and what problems the students will work on, know the software that your students will be using, participate in all synchronous and asynchronous discussions, constantly monitor the discussion and following the student progress. Facilitators should not resort to PowerPoint presentations because it is an “un-engaging way to deliver content in an online or virtual environment” (Piskurish, 2010). Facilitators must keep in constant contact with their students. While it is very difficult for a facilitator to communicate with all the students, the facilitator can’t disassociate themselves in the online environment.
Resources
Berge, Z.L. (2007). Barriers and the organization's capabilities for distance education. Distance
Education, 4(4), 1-15.
Berge, Z.L., Muilenburg, L.Y., & Van Haneghan, J. (2002). Barriers to distance education and
training survey results. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 409-418.
Forrester, G., & Parkinson, G. (2006). 'mind the gap': the application of a conceptual model to
investigate distance learners' expectations and perceptions of induction. Issues in
Educational Research, 16(2), 152-170.
Piskurich, G., & Chauser, J. (n.d.a). Facilitating Online Learning. [Video]. Retrieved from
http://mym.cdn.laureatemedia.
com/Walden/EDUC/6135/07/downloads/WAL_EDUC6135_07_A_EN-CC.zip
Piskurich, G., & Chauser, J. (n.d.b). Planning and designing online courses. [Video]. Retrieved
from http://mym.cdn.laureatemedia.
com/Walden/EDUC/6135/05/downloads/WAL_EDUC6135_05_A_EN-CC.zip
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2009). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson
Piskurich, Dr. George. (2010) Video Program: “Facilitating Distance Learning”, Walden University, L aureate Education.